Some researchers have said that the state of society is looking very conflict, some researchers see umjikindago very functional society. Some researchers are interested in individual actors, and some researchers are interested in the social structure of how a moving place. Some researchers qualitative research, quantitative research is mainly to some researchers.
By default, the researchers looked at the social phenomena to establish research topics research questions, research design, research methods, data collection methods to determine the value of their subjective and are likely to be involved. In addition, with respect to the study "This study is significant in terms of - and in this regard in the future" should, even if the claimed value of the intervention takes place. Therefore, to define research topics, or even if you conclude that the results highlight the value-neutral, but this process is applied to the researcher's preference for a certain value of the association of concessions.
So researchers are asking what the value-neutral? This is in accordance with the study design and conduct research, that is, to establish data collection and study, the researchers analyze the data collected with their personal values and subjective, and says that should not intervene.
How do value-neutral thing? It's like a football game between countries in both countries with the nationality of one person is the same as the judgment. Determination of a fair and neutral referee for making what should do? Its judgment the ball is coming towards the player or car, only to foul an opponent or a yellow card, its cold player goal the ball into the map not working, etc. If you admit that? If so, the judgment will be the coming of the decision is controversial, even if it eventually wins the country will always be a problem.
R versa. Most of the researchers to study the social phenomena to which it belongs to. Intimacy is a very well taken care of, or to, or for the convenience of their own judgment as the coming of the research problem. The researchers say the value of the coming judgment is a matter of intervention.
For example, District of questions they want to collect data and value questions involved as creating questions can give you answers to some of the groups surveyed only a limited, skewing the results of experiments and surveys, literature themselves to the adverse opinion or descriptive information, but without putting a favorable material, interviews and participant observation data for the materials according to their own subjective interpretation of it properly, including the judgment is coming and everything is the same. Thus, researchers who do not happen to need is the basics of value-neutral.
However, the referee of the match, you may be inadvertently coming. In this case, if it was not intentional, it is pointed out that other people accept or even later apologized for his mistake, you can see the scene.
The same is true for the researchers. Their research efforts in the process as much as possible for the value-neutral, but inevitably there are cases where the value is involved. At this point, researchers and their research process to the public, and others that are involved in this study talk about the value of the research process, including a new look in this re-analysis by showing the value of efforts to strive for neutrality. Value-neutral, yet ultimately the duty of the researcher as researchers try to research as much as possible under the conscience of the process.
How to objectify the subjective researchers
"The Little Prince" is read out and are enjoying the conversation. Asked the little prince. "This figure fright, n?" Adults watched the figure replied. "I'm scared? Writing hat on the head, so what's scary?" But the little prince, rather than green hat boa constrictor swallowing a whole elephant was painted. After all those who do not know the intentions of the little prince, the little prince in the shape of a hat that looks like an elephant draws.
Thus, what we observe in daily life is understood differently by different people to describe a phenomenon frequently occurs. People are generally organized according to their world view is due.
Yes, depending on people's subjective understanding of the world does not completely different. Katakana way to see what this stone 'stone.' Says, but what it 'gravel that' he will. The other 'rock it' you will say, what it 'doldeongeori the' I will. Differently to the same destination, and both refer to the observations.
But there is one kind of similarity. 'Stone, gravel, stone, doldeongeori' perception of the difference, but basically does not deviate significantly from the recognition of the stone. This' stone, gravel, stone, doldeongeori "I recognize that this is a personal reflection of the subjective side. Yet the subjective opinion of the people that contain a certain amount of similarity can be seen that: 1)
Experience in a similar environment or a constant in the case of people, each with something based on their own subjective skater while many people gather subjective contained therein, and to determine the similarity of its own because of certain similarities to the conclusion that can be . Thus, with each one looks like shit in terms of subjectivity, that is organized into a number of people "share" but it is considered that subjectivity is called inertia.
While his own research, the researchers organized their own to maintain the objectivity that is not inclined to look who is "it is" acceptable to say to move on objectivity, but in some cases, other researchers have seen similar studies when 'it It seems to 'ensure the recognition is possible only if the inertia is considered the elimination of subjectivity will be able to understand you want to be tried.
Researchers are conducting research in this regard, while trying to eliminate as much as possible should be subjectivity. Eventually researchers about the objectivity of the research process is a value-neutral or deemed to be authorized to speak with inertia. Therefore considered to be objective and to inertia, the researchers designed their study and the research process is opened to accommodate other people's criticism and reflective of their own reflection about the research process and not worth what ever happened intervention is necessary to reflect the attitude .
No comments:
Post a Comment