Preventive measures and cause of the war
As a struggle between the populations political or country hostilities with armed conflict or large-scale long-term.
Is called the theory of war, those codified principles of preventive measures and cause of the war, the theory of war, the field of military science, such as strategy and tactics, logistics and information of the war is also under consideration. Such as the description of relations and institutions of society and the description of the biological, psychological factors, theories about the cause of the war is about to distinguish two types. However, sometimes in response to believe in any theory, prevention of war is pessimistic, it is also optimistic.War theory that begins with inner impulses of the human nature was raised by ethologist, psychologist-psychoanalyst to observe the behavior of animals, by analogy to human interpretation to this. Theory of war ethologist begins from the point of view convincingly throughout the fight of animals, war of humans that can understand. For example, it is possible If we observe the behavior of monkeys have been trapped in the We find similarities and behavior children basically. Aggressive behavior of children and monkeys, has arisen from the impulse of some typical.
That is, if the aggressive behavior is intended to obtain something, if strangers and children monkey has entered, it will be displayed when you frustrated to try something. However, with respect to trying to figure out human behavior based on the behavior of animals, as well as sociologists, prudent ethologist who some also raise questions. It may be observed the behavior of animals, will be an important clue To make a hypothesis about the cause of human behavior, but the exact verification of the cause of human behavior, study the behavior of actual human It is possible only by the. Therefore, the only basis idea is not enough to hypothesis of ethologist made without verification of these processes. Furthermore, it is pointed out by environmental influences, so may differ in many different lots of human behavior, it is not possible to provide a framework for constant as in the case of animals.
While collecting the resources you need to support the theory of their own, on the other hand, the main reason for the war, animal behavior scholars, has appeared theory to search from the psychological aspects of the human being. If the leaders and policy makers in the country or have fallen into psychological maladjustment state, have an inferiority complex stereotypes and wrong, psychological these approaches, may lead to serious consequences very I have emphasized that there. However, the cause of the war which they claim is a variety that influence aggression of human nature, the force of public opinion, such as the decisions of policy makers. In spite of it, they agree that the danger of war is reduced accordingly to improve the fitness of the individual to society, and to reduce the dissatisfaction and anxiety sense of fear. Psychological theory and the biological theory that we have ever seen, there is utility of each, but we were never able to grasp the full precautions and cause of the war. Since there is a possibility that change frequently and any number according to different social situations human behavior. Thus, thinkers to search for answers in social situations just such, have focused research in an international environment that country and the structure of the nation is facing.
Theory of the nature of the country, trying to find the cause of the war can be divided into theory of socialist theory and liberal. According to the liberal political philosophy that began in his book of economist John Stuart Mill in England in the 19th century, war is caused by the dictatorship government, ignoring the will of the people who want peace. Therefore, the war can be prevented by introducing universal suffrage. Because, if the government aggressive tenants, people is because it is possible through the election at any time, to drive out the government such. Liberal who Thomas pane since, has emphasized the importance of public opinion for the construction of peace and the establishment of a republic always. However, the First World War, as long as the adjustment of the structure of the international community is not made, the only republic adoption of individual countries, they came to the conclusion to keep the peace is difficult.
Unlike the Liberals, Socialists was considered the main cause of the war the socio-economic system of the country. The cause of the war, rather than the behavior of the country, philosopher Karl Marx in the 19th century Germany, claimed the class structure of society. Under the capitalist mode of production, there are two major classes of hostility that the proletariat is the working class and the bourgeoisie is the capitalist class. Therefore, if there in Marx, eliminating the root cause, that is, the only way to avoid war was achieved by replacing the socialist capitalism, extinguish the national and class struggle. However, there is a limit to his theory. Even in communist society, nationalism has exercised a powerful influence than the socialist, communist regime, was put down physically occurs more than once a "national liberation movement" by this. It nationalism that occur nationalist movement in socialist society to talk about loyalty to the "nation" is, had had exposed the contradiction "state" that there is undeniably in it to Marx theory . In addition, if the theory as his war socialist state between I can not even imagine, but in fact, border dispute since 1962, more than 20 years, the Soviet Union and China are placed in the risk of war had.
On the other hand, thinkers, some to blame special interest groups and nationalism the cause of the war. Was induced the war, nationalism leads to difficulties in the recognition of defeat and compromise in practice. However, nationalism of Western Europe, does not act on the cause of the war is no longer important. According to the theory of special interest groups, the war generated by jumping into war against the will of the people that few people who have a strong impact force is to influence government, peace-loving basically be. Yours the most dangerous in the special interest groups that induce war is a (military), manufacturers are engaged in the field of cutting-edge technology also exercise considerable influence in order to determine the level of armaments in the country be. However, the final decision to choose peace or war, in that they are politicians, influence of these not be said to be absolute.
War is considered to be caused by a complex interaction of biological, psychological, sociological factors, but the cause of the war did not fully understood by itself. people regarded as a major cause of international environment to induce war, trying to suppress the war by preparing the appropriate equipment international. As peacekeeping equipment specific to either a concept it is currently being implemented, regional integration, such as economic cooperation, social and political diplomacy, the European Economic Community of (EEC) between Member States, international law, the UN, and there is a world government (→ index: international relations).
Mission of the UN is the maintenance of peace and security of the international. The UN Charter, peacekeeping three proposed to be related to each other is on. First of all, is a peaceful resolution through dialogue, the second is a collective security, in the third, it is disarmament. By taking collective action in opposition to the country, which is defined as invaders many countries of collective security is entered into an agreement, is a device international in order to maintain the peace (→ Index: collective safety security). The main purpose of collective security is that it has formed a strong international allies unable to look down any invaders, to prevent in advance the danger of war. Disarmament proposal is based on the theory that there is a tendency that would arms race all countries trying to hold weapons more than potential competition country, caused by this rush toward the war in the end. However, in many cases, this method is to confuse cause and effect.
Since there is a limit to the effectiveness of international peacekeeping diplomacy, regional integration, international law, such as the UN, the only way to avoid war, thinkers of many, that to establish a world government worldwide It has been argued that. The world believes the government must create the they, it would be so in the end, it is exploring the best way to achieve world government. However, I think the establishment of world government is possible in theory, some people, is the preferable course of action, but the only utopia in practice. However, they agree to say regardless of the feasibility of world government, war is tragic disaster. Therefore, to determine the cause of these wars, based on this, you are trying to prevent war by mobilizing every possible move.
War picture
No comments:
Post a Comment